Charles Darwin Has A Posse

On the 100th Anniversary of Einstein's publication of E=MC2, Spiked surveyed 250 renown scientists. They asked, "if you could pick one thing to teach the world about science, what would it be?" Richard Dawkins response, "Darwinian natural selection, and its enormous explanatory power, as the only known explanation of 'design'", hits at one of our most important discoveries; that intelligent design is an illusion of statistical improbability. His answer couldn't be bettered timed to meet the challenge of our Bush-wacked America.

Richard Dawkins
Charles Simonyi professor of the public understanding of science at the University of Oxford, and science writer and broadcaster

The scientific principle that I wish everyone understood is Darwinian natural selection, and its enormous explanatory power, as the only known explanation of 'design'.

The world is divided into things that look designed, like birds and airliners; and things that do not look designed, like rocks and mountains. Things that look designed are divided into those that really are designed, like submarines and tin openers; and those that are not really designed, like sharks and hedgehogs. The diagnostic feature of things that look designed is that they are statistically improbable in the functional direction. They do something useful - for instance, they fly. Darwinian natural selection, although it involves no true design at all, can produce an uncanny simulacrum of true design. An engineer would be hard put to decide whether a bird or a plane was the more aerodynamically elegant.

Not only can natural selection mimic design; it is the only known natural process that can mimic design. And now, here is the most difficult thing that I wish people understood. True design can never be an ultimate explanation for anything, because the designer himself is left unexplained. Designers are statistically improbable things, and trying to explain them as made by prior designers is ultimately futile, because it leads to an infinite regress.

Natural selection escapes the infinite regress, because it starts simple, and works up gradually - step by step - to statistical improbability, and the illusion of design. Engineers and other designers are ultimately made, like all living things, by natural selection.

So distant are many people from understanding this, they seriously believe that the existence of functional improbability is evidence in favour of intelligent design - the greater the improbability, the stronger the evidence. Truly, the precise opposite is the case. I wish that more people understood this.

via: One Good Move


Unfortunately, the same people who read Spiked are not likely to be the same folks pushing for "intelligent design" to be taught alongside Evolution in your local Biology classroom.

I'm still going to "err" on the side of "intelligent design" and allow it to coexist with evolution. This requires a leap into the uncomfortable realm of paradox and mystery.

My appendix seems to be telling me there is nothing intelligent about my design.

What's "intelligent" about something useless and unnecessary like and appendix? Not everything has to have a function. That's part of the mystery.

There's no mystery in that we aren't designed. Millions of years of evolution has brought life to its current state and millions more years will change it again. We were never made in the image of a God, we were made in image of a mouse and a fish.

Maybe evolution is the "intelligent design".

Image of God" as I see it is in the creative/ mystical/spiritual/sense rather than in the corporeal sense. Evolutionary theory (man in the image of a fish)is fine with me... I haven't taken the Adam and Eve stuff as literal truth since I was 5.

Yet one can go back and back and back to that mass of whatever was the initial start of the current universe and which might have expanded and contracted in an endless cycle for all backward eternity but it's all still just a theory. BTW ever read any Stephen Hawking?

As to the matters which are in the realm of mystery... the unanswerables that we could debate fruitlessly forever I hereby must declare a truce and go fold the laundry. Let's just agree to disagree. Beth

"Evolution is just a theory" is the Bush administration's way of downplaying the definition of theory to support their agenda to teach creationism in our schools.

This is just what the definition of a theory is: "a set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena, especially one that has been repeatedly tested or is widely accepted and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena."

A theory is based on facts. Religion is just based on fiction. When facts contradict a theory, the theory changes to fit the facts. When facts contradict religion, religion changes the facts to fit the fiction.



Popular Topics